OSTEOCHONDROMA (Multiple Exostosis)

Frank Cuce, D,O., Resident Orthopaedic Surgery

KIRK W. DABNEY, M.D,, Attending Orthopaedic Surgery

June 19, 1996

CLINICAL CASE PRESENTATION

ORTHOPAEDIC DEPARTMENT

THE ALFRED I. DUPONT INSTITUTE

WILMINGTON, DELAWARE

CASE HISTORY:

HISTORY

S.G. is a 12 year old BF who presented with a chief complaint of left knee pain on the medial aspect of the proximal tibia. The pain was described as a dull, aching pain present for one year's time, occassionally awakening her from sleep and occassionally worsening with sports activities.

Her past medical history was essentially unremarkable. There was a questionable family history for "bony tumors".

PHYSICAL EXAMINATION

Physical examination revealed full range of motion of all her extremities. She was neurovascularly intact. DTR's were normal and symmetric. Palpation at the left knee revealed an asymptomatic mass at the distal femur medially and a painful protrusion at the medial proximal tibia.

XRAYS

X-rays of her left knee in the AP/lat/oblique views revealed multiple exostoses of the distal femur and proximal tibia. These were also noted in bilateral forearm films at the proximal and distal poles .

DISPOSITION OF CASE

Secondary to the painful nature of the proximal tibial osteochondroma, it

was excised. She was placed in a knee immobilizer and discharged on POD #1.

DISCUSSION

ETIOLOGY

Two theories:

  1. Virchow in 1891 - Physeal theory where portion of plate separates and rotates 90 degrees; he could not substantiate.
  2. Plate defect theory proposed by Keith in 1920 and supported by studies done by D'Ambrosia and Ferguson in 1968. They produced exostoses by physeal cartilage transplantation demonstrating and supporting the concept that exostoses are developmental physeal growth defects.
GROWTH
INDICATIONS FOR EXCISION
  1. Development of painful bursae
  2. Location that subjects tumor to recurrent injury
  3. Significant cosmetic deformity
  4. Clinical or radiographic suspicion that malignant degeneration has occurred
COMPLICATIONS
  1. Malignant degeneration is most significant of potential problems
  2. Pseudoaneurysm
REFERENCES:
  1. Lange RH, et al. Correlative Radiographic, Scintigraphic, and Histologic Evaluation of Exostoses. JBJS 66A;9:1454-1459 1984.
  2. Cardelia JM, et al. Proximal Fibular Osteochondroma with Associated Peroneal Nerve Palsy: A review of six Cases. JPO 15:574-577, 1995.
  3. Shapiro F, et al. Hereditary Multiple Exostoses. JBJS 61A;6:815-824, 1979.
  4. Solomon L. Hereditary Multiple Exostosis, JBJS, 45B;2:292-3049 1963.
  5. D'Ambrosia R, Ferguson ABR. The Formation of Osteochondroma by Epiphyseal Cartilage Transplantation. Clin, Orthop, 61:103, 1968.
  6. Enneking WF. Musculoskeletal Tumor Surgery. Surgical Considerations in Specific Tumors. ed. Churchill Livingstone Inc., New York, Vol 21 892-913@ 1983.